February 20, 2026
MiniMax M2.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6: The $0.15 Model
MiniMax M2.5 scores 80.2% on SWE-Bench Verified—within 0.6% of Claude Opus 4.6—at roughly $0.15 per task vs $3.00.
Read more →Ranked by published benchmarks. No bullshit.
We aggregate scores from peer-reviewed research: MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval, and more. See our methodology →
The best overall. Agentic coding, 1M token context, adaptive thinking.
Latest GPT-4 iteration. Strong across all benchmarks.
Best context window (2M tokens). Excellent multimodal.
Surprise contender. Matches Claude on MMLU. Great pricing.
Best value Claude. Great for everyday use.
+5 more on desktop
Logic, problem-solving, and complex decision-making capabilities.
Mathematical computation, symbolic manipulation, and quantitative analysis.
Information synthesis, citation accuracy, and comprehensive analysis.
Adaptive behavior, continuous improvement, and knowledge retention.
What makes an AI agent rank well? It's not magic - it's engineering.
Top agents have well-defined goals and success metrics. Vague objectives produce vague results.
The best agents maintain state, understand context windows, and know when they need more information.
Shit breaks. Top agents gracefully handle failures and provide useful feedback when things go wrong.
Responsible data practices aren't optional. Clear policies on what's stored, how, and for how long.
February 20, 2026
MiniMax M2.5 scores 80.2% on SWE-Bench Verified—within 0.6% of Claude Opus 4.6—at roughly $0.15 per task vs $3.00.
Read more →February 19, 2026
What's the deal with reasoning models? We explain the paradigm shift and when to use them vs standard LLMs.
Read more →February 19, 2026
MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval, GPQA — we break down what each benchmark measures and which ones matter for your use case.
Read more →